48
48
the root file, and continue booting.
50
50
Now, of course the initial RAM disk image is not on the encrypted
51
root file system, so anyone who had physical access could take the
52
server offline and read the disk with their own tools to get the
53
authentication keys used by a client. *But*, by then the Mandos
54
server should notice that the original server has been offline for
55
too long, and will no longer give out the encrypted key. The timing
56
here is the only real weak point, and the method, frequency and
57
timeout of the server’s checking can be adjusted to any desired
51
root file system, so anyone who would come and take the the whole
52
computer would have the Mandos client key when they took the server
53
offline and read the disk with their own tools. *But*, by then the
54
Mandos server will have detected that the original server is no
55
longer online and will no longer give out the encrypted key. The
56
timing here is the only real weak point, and the method, frequency
57
and timeout of checking can be adjusted to any desired level of
60
60
(The encrypted keys on the Mandos server is on its normal file
61
system, so those are safe, provided the root file system of *that*
61
system, so those are safe, provided the root file system of that
62
62
server is encrypted.)
64
64
* FAQ - couldn’t the security be defeated by...
72
72
all *before* the Mandos server timeout kicks in and the Mandos
73
73
server refuses to give out the key to anyone.
75
Now, as the typical SOP seems to be to barge in and turn off and
76
grab *all* computers, to maybe look at them months later, this is
77
not likely. If someone does that, the whole system *will* lock
78
itself up completely, since Mandos servers are no longer running.
80
For sophisticated attackers who *could* do the clever thing, *and*
81
had physical access to the server for enough time, it would be
82
simpler to get a key for an encrypted file system by using hardware
83
memory scanners and reading it right off the memory bus.
75
As the typical SOP seems to be to barge in and turn off and grab
76
*all* computers to maybe look at them months later, this is not
86
80
Nope, the network stuff is all done over TLS, which provides
94
88
** Physically grabbing the Mandos server computer?
95
89
You could protect *that* computer the old-fashioned way, with a
96
90
must-type-in-the-password-at-boot method. Or you could have two
97
computers be the Mandos server for each other.
99
Multiple Mandos servers can coexist on a network without any
100
trouble. They do not clash, and clients will try all available
101
servers. This means that if just one reboots then the other can
102
bring it back up, but if both reboots at the same time they will
103
stay down until someone types in the password on one of them.
91
computers be the Mandos server for each other. (Multiple Mandos
92
servers can coexist on a network without any trouble. They do not
93
clash, and clients will try all available servers.)
105
95
** Faking ping replies?
106
96
The default for the server is to use "fping", the replies to which
113
103
* Security Summary
114
104
So, in summary: The only weakness in the Mandos system is from
116
1. The power to come in and physically take your servers, *and*
106
1. The power to come in and physically take your servers, and
117
107
2. The cunning and patience to do it carefully, one at a time, and
118
108
*quickly*, faking Mandos client/server responses for each one
119
109
before the timeout.
122
112
these attributes, they do not, probably, constitute the majority.
124
114
If you *do* face such opponents, you must figure that they could
125
just as well open your servers and read the file system keys right
126
off the memory by running wires to the memory bus.
115
just as well open your servers and read the keys right off the
116
memory by running wires to the memory bus.
128
What Mandos is designed to protect against is *not* such determined,
129
focused, and competent attacks, but against the early morning knock
130
on your door and the sudden absence of all the servers in your
131
server room. Which it does nicely.
118
What this system is designed to protect against is *not* such
119
determined, focused, and competent attacks, but against the early
120
morning knock on your door and the sudden absence of all servers in
added
removed
README
